Home Game Reviews Space Explorers Review

Space Explorers Review

2268
0
Review of: Space Explorers
Board Game Review by: :
Jason Kelm
Price:
$30

Reviewed by:
Rating:
4.5
On Aug 7, 2020
Last modified:Aug 7, 2020

Summary:

We review Space Explorers, an engine-building board game published by 25th Century Games. In Space Explorers, players are trying to earn the most victory points over the course of the game.

Space Explorers Review

Space Explorers

The space race during the 1950s is such an interesting topic for me. World powers competed for technological greatness to discover the unknowns of the universe and to reach out and touch those things we have only seen through telescopes.

Space Explorers, designed by Yuri Zhuravljov and published by 25th Century Games, has 2-4 players embodying Soviet scientists who worked to achieve aeronautic greatness.

Gameplay Overview:

All players start out with one of each colored resource, one specialist card, and their personal Hub. Throughout the game, players will use their resources, abilities of their specialists, and cards to recruit the right people for their Hub. The game ends once a player has recruited their 12th specialist or the final project is completed. Players will earn points from recruited specialists, bonuses, and projects they complete.

Space Explorers Satellites
A look at some of the projects players can earn for extra end game points. Players with specialists matching the indicated skills will be able to take these projects at the end of their turn.

On a player’s turn, they may draw a specialist card, either from a deck or from an available row, or recruit a specialist to their Hub. Since this first action is fairly self-explanatory, we’ll focus on how to recruit specialists.

Players may recruit specialists to their Hub, either from their hand or from the publicly available row. Each specialist has a different cost that can be paid by using available resources, cards in hand, and/or from resources generated from recruited specialists. You can use any combination of these methods.

When you use your resource tokens, those are passed to the player on your left. Because sharing your scientific knowledge benefits all of mankind. You may also use any cards in your hand, discarding them to the available public row, where they will be worth two of any resource. The more specialists players recruit to columns means that any future specialists recruited to those columns will have a reduced cost, setting up a nice engine builder feel.

Lastly, after a player has taken their action, if they have enough specialists in their Hub, they will be able to complete an available project that’s set out at the beginning of the game.

Space Explorers Game Experience
The artwork captures an eye-pleasing and colorful 50s art style. The only thing hindering these cards from perfection is the unintuitive iconography for specialist abilities indicated at the bottom of certain cards.

Game Experience:

Let’s start with the rulebook. Because if you’ve read my reviews before or talked to me about my feelings about rulebooks, you know that I despise a bad or poorly executed rulebook. It hampers the learning experience and keeps players from getting into the game. Space Explorers doesn’t do that. In fact, its rulebook is on point. From the clear-pictured examples to the easy-on-the-eyes formatting, players will have no trouble learning this game and finding information.

I played Space Explorers several times with my niece over the last few months and I have to say, we consistently had very tight games. Like 2-point difference games. It was really exciting and fun because it wasn’t always clear who had won. I really appreciated that and was also pleased to find this also happened in my solo games, which I’ll touch on next.

Space Explorers Solo
If you want to try out the solo variant, you can print it and try it for yourself. It’s a great implementation that will hone your abilities to hate draft against the AI. Also, it’s available for purchase of you enjoy it.

During the initial Kickstarter, there was an opportunity for backers to receive a solo version of the game. I had discovered this by accident during hellscape 2020 and printed it off. If you’re interested in solo variants, I highly suggest taking a look at it. You can find a file for it on the BGG page for this game. I really liked how the solo game changed things up from a multiplayer game and made you think about what to draft, or rather hate draft against the AI. I won’t get into all the ins and outs of how this variant works, but suffice it to say, it’s worth it if that’s your thing. I went so far as to buy the printed copy of the rules and components from the publisher. I enjoyed it that much.

As I mentioned, many of the specialists in this game have special abilities which are really helpful and crucial for helping players eek out more points. While some of the iconography that indicates what those abilities provide, like extra resources, was intrusive, I found many that were not. This was a little frustrating and could have tanked the game. However, there is a very easy and crucial player aid that states what each ability is and what it does. It’s also easy to find your card, as all specialist cards are numbered and are so displayed on the aid. I think if the iconography had been more consistently intuitive, not only would that speed up the game, which can induce overthinking by players as it is, it would have made itself even more accessible.

Final Thoughts:

Space Explorers offers some very enjoyable gameplay. Fans of Splendor should do themselves a favor and try it out, as I think they’ll find some similarities in what they enjoyed about that game with some additional things which set it apart. Although the iconography stumbles what could have been a flawless game experience, there is still a lot to enjoy in Space Explorers.

Final Score: 4.5 Stars – A tight-scoring and enjoyable game that misfires with some unintuitive iconography

4.5 Stars

Hits:
• Rulebook is on point (formatting, instructing, pics)
• Solo game provides a satisfying experience that’s different from the multiplayer
• Scoring was consistently tight, no runaway winner
• Eye-pleasing 50s art style

Misses:
• Game can induce player-dependent analysis paralysis
• Iconography could have been more consistently intuitive

Get Your Copy

Leave a Comment